17.5% Decrease In U.S. Agricultural Commodity/Food Products Exports To Cuba In February 2023. Exports Remain Up 10.4% Year-To-Year.

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
April 2023

February 2023 Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Decrease 17.5%- 1
55th Of 216 February 2023 U.S. Food/Ag Export Markets- 2
Year-To-Year Exports Increase 10.4%- 2
Cuba Ranked 54th Of U.S. 2023 Ag/Food Export Markets- 2
February 2023 Healthcare Product Exports US$61,354.00- 2
February 2023 Humanitarian Donations US$2,398,423.00- 3
Obama Administration Initiatives Exports Continue- 3
U.S. Port Export Data- 16 (not yet available)

FEBRUARY 2023 FOOD/AG EXPORTS TO CUBA DECREASE 17.5%- Exports of food products and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in February 2023 were US$24,592,601.00 compared to US$29,812,459.00 in February 2022 and US$21,242,760.00 in February 2021. 

February 2023 exports included among other items: Waffles and Wafers; Coffee; Tuna; Condiments; Toilet Paper; Chicken Leg Quarters (Frozen); Chicken Meat (Frozen); Chicken Legs (Frozen); Meat of Swine; Preserved Chicken Meat; Yeasts; Non-Alcoholic Beverages.

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Cuba Banks Again Accepting U.S. Dollar Deposits. That's Good. Better Would Be Providing Regulations For U.S.-Sourced Direct Investment And Direct Financing To MSMEs. First OFAC License Waiting...

“It is very useful for us as a company and more than now we need a lot of capital injection to face the crisis with the purchase of professional machinery.  This gives us the possibility of having currency input that currently could not be exchanged into currencies other than USD.”  Owner of an officially-registered Micro, Small, and Medium-Size Enterprise (MSME) located in the Republic of Cuba and owned by a Republic of Cuba national. 

Granma
Havana, Republic of Cuba
10 April 2023

Financial and banking institutions will accept cash deposits of US dollars in bank accounts (+ Video) 

From this moment on, financial and banking institutions will accept cash deposits of US dollars in bank accounts, and the acceptance of this currency in the operations of buying and selling currencies in the Exchange Market will be maintained as before. 

Resolution 26 of 10 of the Central Bank of Cuba, dated April 2023, 63, which repeals Resolution 2023 of June 6, which prohibited the acceptance of the US dollar in cash by banks and non-bank financial institutions, has been published in the Extraordinary Official Gazette No. 2023 of April 176, 2021, which prohibits the acceptance of the US dollar in cash by banks and non-bank financial institutions, for its banking. 

The repeal of Resolution 176/2021 responds to the current circumstances and priorities of economic policy. The current economic scenario of the country, having overcome the covid-19 pandemic, with the revival of tourism, the resumption of the presence of foreign visitors and the gradual recovery of productive activity and services, suggests taking this step, even though the measures of maximum economic pressure that have extremely reinforced the economic blockade remain in force, particularly those aimed at hindering Cuba's external financial flows and preventing deposits abroad of US dollars in cash. 

The foreign exchange market established in August 2022, among other measures, has created the conditions so that both the possibility of making deposits in US dollars in financial and banking institutions, and of receiving that currency in cash from exchange operations, can be accepted, as it was in the past. 

Since the policy of economic pressure that led to the June 2021 decision remains in place, the underlying problem has not been resolved. Therefore, it will be necessary to monitor the evolution of banking and financial activity from this new step, with the confidence that it will be beneficial for national economic activity and for the population, and with the willingness to make the adjustments that are pertinent according to their behavior. 

From this moment on, financial and banking institutions will accept cash deposits of US dollars in bank accounts, and the acceptance of this currency in the operations of buying and selling currencies in the Exchange Market will be maintained, as until now. 

LINK Las instituciones financieras y bancarias aceptarán depósitos en efectivo de dólares estadounidenses en cuentas bancarias (+ Video) › Cuba › Granma - Órgano oficial del PCC 

Central Bank of the Republic of Cuba
Havana, Republic of Cuba
10 April 2023

En la Gaceta Oficial Extraordinaria No. 26 del día 10 de abril de 2023 ha sido publicada la Resolución 63 de 2023 del Banco Central de Cuba, de fecha 6 de abril de 2023, que deroga la Resolución 176 de junio de 2021, que prohibía la aceptación del dólar estadounidense en efectivo por parte de los bancos e instituciones financieras no bancarias, para su bancarización.

La derogación de la Resolución 176/2021, responde a las circunstancias y prioridades actuales de la política económica. El actual escenario económico del país, habiendo superado la pandemia COVID 19, con el inicio de la reanimación del turismo, la reanudación de la presencia de visitantes extranjeros y la recuperación paulatina de la actividad productiva y de servicios, aconseja dar este paso, aun cuando permanecen en vigor las medidas de máxima presión económica que han reforzado en extremo al bloqueo económico, en particular las dirigidas a entorpecer los flujos financieros externos de Cuba e impedir los depósitos en el exterior de dólares estadounidenses en efectivo.

El mercado cambiario establecido en agosto de 2022, entre otras medidas, ha creado las condiciones para que se pueda aceptar, como era en el pasado, tanto la posibilidad de realizar depósitos en dólares estadounidenses en las instituciones financieras y bancarias, como de recibir esa moneda en efectivo a partir de operaciones de canje.

Puesto que la política de presión económica que dio lugar a la decisión de junio de 2021 permanece vigente, el problema de fondo no se ha resuelto. Por consiguiente, será necesario monitorear la evolución de la actividad bancaria y financiera a partir de este nuevo paso, con la confianza de que resultará beneficioso para la actividad económica nacional y para la población, y con la disposición de realizar los ajustes que resulten pertinentes según su comportamiento. 

A partir de este momento las instituciones financieras y bancarias aceptarán depósitos en efectivo de dólares estadounidenses en cuentas bancarias, y se mantendrá como hasta el presente, la aceptación de esta moneda en las operaciones de compra y venta de divisas en el Mercado Cambiario.

LINK https://www.bc.gob.cu/noticia/nota-del-banco-central-de-cuba/1736

Verdict By London Court In Cuba Debt Lawsuit: From Court- Money Remains Owed By Cuba, Cuba Lawfully Changed Assignment Process, Plaintiff Will Seek New Assignment. Another Year In Court?

Court Judgement Excerpt: “CONCLUSIONS AND SERVICE OUT- 400. In conclusion: i) BNC consented on its own behalf to the assignment by ICBC to CRF of its rights and obligations under the Agreements; ii) It lacked capacity to consent on behalf of Cuba to the assignment by ICBC to CRF of its rights under the Guarantee; iii) Accordingly, the rights and obligations of ICBC under the Agreements were validly assigned to CRF, with the result that CRF is entitled to rely on the contractual provisions contained therein as to the jurisdiction of the English court, waiver of immunity and service of process.  401. I therefore find and declare that: i) BNC, on its own behalf, consented to the assignment of the debts represented by the Agreements by ICBC to CRF; ii) Accordingly, the debts represented by the Agreements have been validly assigned by ICBC to CRF; APPROVED JUDGMENT CRF v Banco 94 iii) The Court has jurisdiction to try the debt claims herein; iv) BNC is not immune from the jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to the SIA; and v) The conditions for the service of the Claim Form out of the jurisdiction upon BNC have been satisfied.”

LINK TO 3-PAGE APPROVED JUDGEMENT (4 April 2023)

LINK TO 94-PAGE APPROVED JUDGEMENT IN PDF FORMAT (4 April 2023)

London, UK, 4th April 2023
Cuba Defeated in English High Court by CRF
CRF I Limited v. Banco Nacional de Cuba and Republic of Cuba - CL-2020-000092 090

Following a landmark ruling by the English High Court in favour of CRF I Limited, Mr. David Charters, the Chairman of CRF provided a series of quotes for a press release, highlighting the company's commitment to ethical business practices and its intent to work closely with the Cuban government to reach a mutually beneficial solution.  Mr. Charters stated, "We are pleased that a Senior Judge in the English High Court has recognised CRF as a responsible creditor, and not a vulture fund, contrary to Cuban assertions. This decision reaffirms our commitment to conducting business in an ethical and responsible manner." 

Mr. Charters continued, "We have always maintained that the claims of bribery against CRF I Limited and our colleague Jeet Gordhandas were baseless, and we are pleased that this has been confirmed by a costs order against Cuba. We remain committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity and transparency in our business dealings."  In response to a prior recent statement from Cuban Justice Minister Silvera, Mr. Charters welcomed Cuba's recognition of CRF as a legitimate creditor: "We welcome the statement from Minister Silvera that Cuba will recognize our legitimate debts and legitimate creditors, as CRF is both. We look forward to working with the Cuban government to find a mutually beneficial solution." 

Emphasising CRF's commitment to supporting the Cuban economy, Mr. Charters added, "CRF remains committed to finding a solution with Cuba that has zero impact on its budget for at least 5 years, recognising the difficult economic situation the country is facing. We believe that a mutually beneficial solution can be reached through constructive dialogue and cooperation."  Addressing a technical point in the judgement, Mr. Charters concluded, "BNC was the Central Bank of Cuba and remains responsible for managing these unpaid Cuban debts. Cuba won a technical point in this judgement which we have already remedied and we do not expect this issue to impact the eventual final outcome, which is a complete victory for CRF."” 

"Further to our press release earlier this morning, please see below a further release by Rosenblatt: The Rosenblatt team - Harvey Rands, George Jackson, Madeleine Binkley and Tracy Tsao - is pleased to have obtained a landmark judgment establishing jurisdiction against Banco Nacional de Cuba in respect of Cuban sovereign debt held by their client CRF I Limited.  In judgment handed down yesterday, the Commercial Court held that CRF are a legitimate creditor of Cuban sovereign debt payable by Banco Nacional de Cuba, the former Cuban central bank, having agreed to an assignment of two debt positions from ICBC Standard Bank to CRF.  The court rejected Cuba’s contrived allegations both of bribery, and that CRF is a vulture fund. Cuba’s allegation of bribery was cynically maintained without foundation for two years before being dropped shortly before trial.  CRF may now proceed to a substantive trial to enforce recovery of the sovereign debt that it unequivocally owns. In the meantime, Banco Nacional de Cuba has been ordered to make a payment of £575,000 to CRF on account of costs.  The Republic of Cuba relied on Cuban law to establish that the Banco Nacional de Cuba could not consent to an assignment of Cuban sovereign debt on its behalf. Accordingly, CRF have now made an express request directly to the Republic of Cuba for consent to assign the underlying guarantees, which they have no ground to refuse in accordance with the judgment handed down.

Other Release Notes:  It's important to note that CRF has already re-filed and Cuba must accept the assignment or risk being deemed unreasonably withholding. Cuba has bought themselves 28 days.  CRF appears to be the clear winner in this situation, as it has a draft order for costs. This suggests that CRF has a strong case and is likely to come out on top.  Another important point to consider is that CRF is a bona fide creditor. This means that they have a legitimate claim to the funds in question, which strengthens their position in any legal proceedings.  Finally, it's worth noting that all creditors know exactly how to put Cuba in the crosshairs. This suggests that Cuba may face additional legal challenges in the future if they continue to withhold funds from CRF or other creditors. Ultimately, it's in Cuba's best interest to resolve this situation as quickly and fairly as possible."

Granma
Havana, Republic of Cuba
4 April 2023

República de Cuba gana pleito en Londres: CRF no es acreedor del Estado cubano
La sentencia acoge el planteamiento sostenido por la parte cubana durante el proceso y desestima la reclamación de CRF contra el Estado cubano


En audiencia desarrollada este martes 4 de abril (08.45 horas de Londres) en la Alta Corte de Inglaterra y Gales, la jueza Sara Cockerill notificó a los abogados de las partes la sentencia correspondiente a la demanda interpuesta por el fondo buitre CRF I Limited contra la República de Cuba y el Banco Nacional de Cuba (BNC).  La sentencia acoge el planteamiento sostenido por la parte cubana durante el proceso y desestima la reclamación de CRF contra el Estado cubano. La resolución judicial confirma que las irregularidades cometidas por funcionarios del BNC, sujetas a investigación penal primero y a sentencia judicial después, fueron motivos razonables para que el gobierno cubano negara su consentimiento en ceder la deuda a favor de CRF.  El documento afirma, tal como venía alegando la República de Cuba, que el BNC no cuenta con capacidad legal ni autoridad para representar al país. Ello ratifica que CRF es un extraño en los instrumentos financieros que reclamaba contra Cuba y no le asistía el derecho a establecer la demanda en Londres; la República de Cuba es, por tanto, inmune a la jurisdicción inglesa y no tiene obligación alguna de responder con su patrimonio ante esta demanda.  Como se ha explicado anteriormente, el objeto central del proceso judicial fue determinar si el tribunal inglés era competente para conocer la reclamación de CRF como acreedor del BNC y de la República de Cuba.  De acuerdo con la sentencia notificada esta mañana, CRF no es acreedor del Estado cubano, lo que significa que la República de Cuba queda fuera del pleito. En lo adelante el proceso continuará solamente contra el Banco Nacional de Cuba, quien tendrá derecho a establecer las reclamaciones que le permite la ley inglesa.  

Google Translate: “In a hearing held this Tuesday, April 4 (08:45 London time) at the High Court of England and Wales, Judge Sara Cockerill notified the lawyers for the parties of the judgment corresponding to the lawsuit filed by the vulture fund CRF I Limited against the Republic of Cuba and the National Bank of Cuba (BNC). The ruling accepts the approach sustained by the Cuban party during the process and dismisses the CRF claim against the Cuban State. The judicial resolution confirms that the irregularities committed by BNC officials, first subject to criminal investigation and later to a judicial sentence, were reasonable grounds for the Cuban government to deny its consent to assign the debt in favor of CRF. The document affirms, as the Republic of Cuba had been claiming, that the BNC does not have the legal capacity or authority to represent the country. This confirms that CRF is a stranger in the financial instruments that it claimed against Cuba and did not have the right to establish the claim in London; the Republic of Cuba is, therefore, immune to English jurisdiction and has no obligation to respond with its assets to this claim. As previously explained, the central purpose of the judicial process was to determine whether the English court was competent to hear the claim of CRF as a creditor of the BNC and of the Republic of Cuba. According to the sentence notified this morning, CRF is not a creditor of the Cuban State, which means that the Republic of Cuba is out of the lawsuit. From now on, the process will continue only against Banco Nacional de Cuba, who will have the right to establish the claims allowed by English law.”

LINK TO 94-PAGE APPROVED JUDGEMENT IN PDF FORMAT (4 April 2023)

On Monday, 23 January 2023, at 10:00 am in London, United Kingdom, an eight-day Jurisdiction Trial commenced with pre-reading for two days, 18 January 2023 and 19 January 2023.  The trial was held at the High Court of Justice, City Court House, Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings, Fetter Ln, London EC4A 1NL. Presiding: Mrs. Justice Sara Cockerill 

CRF I Limited (Cayman Islands), V. Banco Nacional de Cuba, The Republic of Cuba.  High Court of Justice, Business And Property Courts Of England And Wales, Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court [Part 7 Claim- General Commercial Contracts], Royal Courts of Justice. [CL-2020-000092 Filed 18 February 2020; Court Filing Fee £10,000.00 (approximately US$13,000.00].  

From Court Filing: “CRF is a company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. It was established to invest in defaulted Cuban sovereign debt.  CRF gradually acquired a portfolio of Cuban sovereign debt which was valued in the total principal sum of EUR189 million by 31 March 2016, and EUR1,200 million by 26 November 2017.  The majority of that portfolio, and the part that is relevant to these proceedings, was settled by way of risk participation at ICBC.  That is a common arrangement in the sovereign debt market.”   

Rosenblatt (plaintiff)
Memery Crystal (plaintiff- firm merged with Rosenblatt)
7 King’s Bench Walk (plaintiff)
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher UK LLP (previously for plaintiff)
PCB Byrne LLP (defendant)
Essex Court Chambers (defendant)
Uria Menendez (defendant)
 

Links To Related Analyses 

Four Convicted Cubans Are Defense Witnesses In London Bank Trial; One From Prison. Actual Bribery No Longer Defense Strategy; Allegation Of Bribery Remains. Skeletons Tell All? January 18, 2023 

36 Months Of Litigation; US$5.8 Million On Attorneys By Cayman Islands-Based Plaintiff And Havana-Based Defendants, Now London Trial. KCs Lead Sides. Issues: Interpol Red Notice, Jurisdiction, Bribery Jan 13, 2023   

China-Owned Bank In London Sues Cuba Central Bank And Government Of Cuba. Either Sue For Custodian Account Holders Or Be Sued By Them? Embarrassing For Cuba To Be Sued By "Good Friend." December 21, 2021  

NOTE: On 28 May 2021, London, United Kingdom-based ICBC Standard Bank Plc filed a lawsuit against Banco Nacional de Cuba and the Government of the Republic of Cuba. The lawsuit (CL-2021-000343) was filed in the High Court of Justice, Commercial Court, Part 7 Claim, Central Commercial Contracts and Arrangements. ICBC Standard Bank Plc is represented by London, United Kingdom-based Herbert Smith Freehills LLP.  The defendants have no counsel listed.  The last update to the lawsuit was 22 November 2021.  The claim document has been completed, but has not been served.  No documents have been filed- and no documents could be filed for months.  LINK  Total amount of claim by ICBC Standard Bank Plc against Banco National de Cuba and Government of the Republic of Cuba is approximately 200 Million Euros (approximately US$224.8 million).  Total amount of interest is approximately 1 Billion Euros (approximately US$1.12 billion).  

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher (London) Represented Plaintiff In US$100 Million Lawsuit Against Cuba. Firm Represents Plaintiff In Libertad Act Lawsuits In Florida, New Jersey, Texas. China A Defendant. December 07, 2021  

UK Lawsuit Seeks US$100+ Million From Central Bank Of Cuba & Government Of Cuba. Four Countries. Three Banks.  Questions- Defining A "Loan" And Capacity To Contract. Read The 14 Court Filings. December 06, 2021

In 2022, World Food Program Spent US$16,335,744.00 In Cuba.  WFP Report Highlights Issues For Women In Agricultural Workplace- “…a lack of women's empowerment persists in Cuba” 

In 2022, World Food Program Spent US$16,335,744.00 In Cuba.  WFP 54-Page Annual Report Highlights Issues For Women In The Agricultural Workplace- “…a lack of women's empowerment persists in Cuba 

“… the country's high dependence on imports and limited access to foreign currencies significantly reduced the availability of domestic and imported food commodities. Moreover, the monetary reform initiated in 2021 reduced food subsidies, pushing inflation higher than forecasted (40 percent from October 2021 to October 2022 [3]) and deepening the dual-currency inequality gap, which led to higher prices of basic goods and services and impacted households’ vulnerability to food insecurity. As a result, the country experienced food shortages, including main cereals (wheat flour, rice, and corn), beans, vegetables, dairy products and meat (beef and pork) [4].” 

“… Cuba is one of the Caribbean countries most exposed to hurricanes, droughts and unseasonal rains. These shocks are expected to become more frequent and severe due to the effects of climate change. Rising sea levels, increase in temperature and decrease in precipitation affect agriculture, forestry and tourism, pillars of the national economy. In the aftermath of Hurricane Ian in September 2022, WFP implemented a 2-month food assistance plan to reach shock-affected populations in the provinces of Pinar del Río, Artemisa, Mayabeque and the municipality of Isla de la Juventud.” 

“The impact of ongoing monetary reform that started in January 2021 was another risk monitored by WFP. This reform, called Tarea Ordenamiento, has not yet achieved the desired results. Therefore, the shortage of basic products and the increase in global food prices contributed to national inflation. WFP will continue to monitor the effects of the reform, especially on the food security of lower-income households.” 

“Cuba ranked 73rd in the Gender Inequality Index out of 170 countries in 2021 [1]. Despite progress, gender inequality and a lack of women's empowerment persists in Cuba, especially in rural areas where women account for 46 percent of the population but only 17 percent of employees in agriculture [2]. Despite national efforts, including a gender strategy for the agriculture system launched in 2016, only 13 percent of members of agricultural cooperatives are women. The persistence of male-centred agricultural systems, patriarchy and gender stereotypes limit women's access to resources, land ownership and decision-making. For example, only 28 percent of management positions in rural areas are performed by women [3]. In general, the presence of women in the agricultural sector is characterized by the limited role of users [4] (36 percent) or landowners (16 percent). Also, there are few incentives for young people to participate in agriculture and their employment in the sector is limited (15 percent). This context has negative effects on the sustainability of food systems.” 

LINK TO COMPLETE 54-PAGE REPORT IN PDF FORMAT

In Moscow…. New Supplies Of Coffee From Cuba, New Brand Too: Guantanamera Coffee 

On Friday, 31 March 2023, a new coffee product from the Republic of Cuba available at GUM Department Store (Gosudarstvenny Universalny Magazin (State Department Store)) located on Red Square In Moscow, Russian Federation.

And…. Packages of coffee viewed in GUM in December 2022 which had labels indicating the coffee products were past their expiration dates, have been replaced.   

If Accurate, Unhelpful To Biden Administration Seeking Openings... “Cuban pres. admires Ayatollah Khamenei's wisdom, leadership"

“Cuban pres. admires Ayatollah Khamenei's wisdom, leadership

TEHRAN, Mar. 21 (MNA) – Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel says that Ayatollah Khamenei is a wise leader who has a tremendous capability for logical thinking and analysis.

In an exclusive interview with Al Mayadeen, the Cuban President talks about Cuba's stance on the war in Ukraine and his country's relationship with different countries.

Speaking about Cuban-Iranian relations, the Cuban president described Iran as Cuba’s sister nation. He said that the foundations of the relationship between the two countries are based on history and mutual respect, as well as the great resistance that the two people waged in the face of imperial blockades and sanctions. According to the Cuban president, "the Cuban and Iranian people share an understanding of resistance, courage, heroism, dignity, and defiance to the plans of imperialist power."

He also expressed his appreciation for the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei as a politician and as the leader of the Iranian Revolution, admiring his “tremendous capability for logical thinking and analysis,” also describing him as a wise leader.

The Cuban president indicated that the two countries are working on joint projects that serve the economic development of both, especially in the fields of energy and food. He pointed out that Iranian President Ebrahim Raeisi might visit his country, while also expressing his desire to visit Tehran this year.

Miguel Diaz-Canel, President of the republic of cuba (2019- )



Diaz-Canel stressed that this year will witness a deepening of relations between the two countries, and the adoption of projects that are of mutual benefit. He specified both nations share mutual projects that include scientific research, technology, and energy.

The Cuban president expressed his admiration for Iran's culture, civilization, and resistance against aggression, and said that the technological development that Iran has achieved despite the embargo and sanctions is very important, and multifaceted, pointing out that being familiar with Iran's development can benefit Havana.  MP/PR”

news/198725/Cuban-pres-admires-Ayatollah-Khamenei-s-wisdom-leadership

Will The Ibero-American Summit of Heads Of State In Santo Domingo Be An Opportunity For Christopher Dodd, SPA For The Americas, To Speak With President Of Cuba?

United States Department of State
Washington DC
24 March 2023

Senior Presidential Advisor for the Americas Dodd’s Travel to the Dominican Republic
Office of the Spokesperson

Special Presidential Advisor (SPA) for the Americas Christopher J. Dodd will travel to Santo Domingo, the Dominican Republic, on March 24-25 to attend the 28th Ibero-American Summit of Heads of State and Government.  SPA Dodd is attending the summit at the invitation of Dominican President Luis Abinader, whose government is hosting the event.  In Santo Domingo, SPA Dodd will attend Summit events and hold bilateral meetings with President Abinader and other regional leaders.  This visit demonstrates the Biden Administration’s commitment to engaging with our neighbors as we work together to encourage inclusive economic growth, confront shared challenges, and promote democracy, human rights, and the rule of law in our hemisphere.

U.S. Department Of State Issues 2022 Cuba Human Rights Practices Report. Corruption And Private Sector Issues Hightlighted

United States Department of State
Washington DC
20 March 2023

2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Cuba

Section 4. Corruption and Lack of Transparency in Government


The law provides criminal penalties for corruption; however, there were numerous reports of government corruption, supported by a poorly regulated and opaque banking sector.  The government was highly sensitive to corruption allegations and often conducted anticorruption crackdowns.

Corruption:  There were numerous reports of police and other official corruption in enforcement of economic restrictions and provision of government services.  For example, employees frequently stole products from government stocks and sold them on the black market.  Corruption by customs officers was also reportedly common.  The government and state-controlled businesses engaged in international money laundering to evade sanctions.

E. ACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS OF WORK

Informal Sector: Despite criminal penalties for doing so, a significant number of workers participated in the informal economy, including individuals who traded on the black market or performed professional activities not officially permitted by the government. There was no publicly available information regarding the size of the informal sector.

Self-employed persons, such as fruit sellers, bicycle taxi drivers, and others, were frequently targeted by police for allegedly acting illegally, even when licensed. Police sometimes arbitrarily and violently closed these businesses and confiscated any goods.

LINK To Department Of State Report Page
LINK To 2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Cuba

USDA Accepting Applications For 2024 Export Programs- Cuba Again Authorized For Participation. Since 2018 Farm Bill, FMD And MAP Focus On Cuba Remains Anemic. Will 2024 Be Different?

“USDA Accepting Applications for FY 2024 Export Programs 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s [USDA] Foreign Agricultural Service is accepting applications from eligible organizations for fiscal year 2024 funding for five export market development programs. FAS recently published the FY 2024 Notices of Funding Opportunity for the Market Access Program, Foreign Market Development Program, Technical Assistance for Specialty Crops Program, Quality Samples Program and Emerging Markets Program.  The application deadline for the five programs is May 19, 2023. 

Background 

Under the Market Access Program, USDA provides competitive, cost-share assistance to U.S. exporters and agricultural, fish, and forest product trade organizations for international marketing and promotion of U.S. commodities and products. More information about the program and the FY 2024 funding opportunity is available at:  https://www.fas.usda.gov/programs/market-access-program-map.  

Under the Foreign Market Development Program, USDA partners with nonprofit agricultural and forest product trade associations to build longer-term international demand for U.S. commodities. More information about the program and the FY 2024 funding opportunity is available at: https://www.fas.usda.gov/programs/foreign-market-development-program-fmd.” 

Defining Anemic: In Five Years, 2018 Farm Bill USDA Provision For Cuba Had No Use Of FMD And Two Uses Of MAP. Approximately 90 U.S.-Based Entities Could Have Participated. That’s A 2.2% Use Rate. Feb 3, 2023   

Source: USDA

In 2018, legislative advocates maintained that inserting a Market Access Program (MAP) and Foreign Market Development (FMD) provision in H.R. 2, the five-year Agriculture Improvement Act, known as the Farm Bill signed into law on 20 December 2018 by Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States was critical to “laying the groundwork” for increasing exports of agricultural commodities and food products to the Republic of Cuba.  Statements from members of the United States Congress included: “… an important first step to regaining our presence in Cuba.”     

Approximately seventy United States-based entities (primarily trade promotion organizations) annually are identified by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as receiving funding for MAP and approximately twenty entities are identified as receiving funding for FMD.   

Leading to the enactment of the 2018 Farm Bill, most observers reasonably concluded that legislative advocates- within the United States Congress and organizations in Washington DC and outside of the beltway would have prominently teed-up at least one high-profile applicant to publicize in advance they would use the provision if it became law or at least one high-profile applicant to immediately and publicly request funding when the 2018 Farm Bill became law on 21 December 2018.     

The most significant impact of an anemic number of MAP/FMD requests and usage in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 is what the lack of interest portends for other legislative efforts in the United States Congress relating to the Republic of Cuba, particularly those focused upon changes to cash-in-advance payment terms for agricultural commodity and food product exports from the United States to the Republic of Cuba required by the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSREEA).  The question opponents will ask: “If authorizing MAP/FMD for Cuba was so important, why have so few organizations used it?”    

The cash-in-advance terms were supported by United States-based exporters while opposed by United States-based agricultural commodity and food product trade promotion organizations.  United States-based exporters were concerned in 2000 and remain concerned in 2023 that with Republic of Cuba government-operated entities maintaining a chronic inability to abide by payment terms other than cash-in-advance, more prudent to retain a perhaps smaller market share with no payment issues rather than a larger market share with endemic, and necessarily publicly-disclosed payment issues.    

Links To Related Analyses 

Members Of U.S. Senate Advocate For Regulatory Changes To Commercial Relationship With Cuba. But, A Significant Part Of What They Seek In Washington Await Decisions In Havana. Mar 16, 2023

In The Olympics, 110-Meter Hurdle Race Has Ten Hurdles.  Senator Klobuchar's Reintroduced Cuba Legislation Has At Least Twelve In The United States Congress. Mar 9, 2023

Better Informed, Richard Branson Could Provide Essential Value To MSMEs In Cuba, To Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Adminstration In Havana, And To Biden-Harris Administration In Washington Feb 15, 2023  

Why No Advance Or Post Visit Mention On State Of Delaware Internet Sites For Visit To Cuba By Secretaries Of Agriculture And State? Under-The-Radar Visits Are Not Helpful. February 14, 2023

Another Unpublicized U.S. Senator Visit To Cuba. Rather Than Focus On What Cuba Private Sector Needs From Cuba Government, He Focuses Upon What Cuba Private Sector Needs From U.S. Government. January 05, 2023 

Mr. de Cossio At MINREX In Cuba Not Quite Accurate With His Comments About Biden-Harris Administration Efforts With MSMEs And Remittances Dec 20, 2022  

If MSMEs Are Important To Cuba, Why Nearing Seven Months And No Regulations Authorizing Foreign Investment And Foreign Financing? Biden Administration And 6,000 MSMEs In Cuba Are Waiting. Nov 30, 2022  

Biden-Harris Administration Approves First Equity Investment Since 1960 In A Private Cuban Company May 10, 2022  

With U.S. Government Authorization For First Direct Equity Investment Into A Private Company In Cuba, Here Is Important Context And Details.  About The Parties; About The Message. May 16, 2022   

Ag Delegations Traveling To Cuba Must Know What Is Possible, Advocate To Government Of Cuba To Permit All That Is Permissible- Direct Export Of Coffee, Cacao, Honey. Complaining Not Constructive. April 14, 2022  

Might Cubaexport In 2020 Permit “Independent Entrepreneurs” To Export Coffee Beans, Cocoa and Honey To The United States? January 14, 2020  

Members Of U.S. Senate Advocate For Regulatory Changes To Commercial Relationship With Cuba. But, A Significant Part Of What They Seek In Washington Await Decisions In Havana.

Three Members Of The United States Senate Advocate For Regulatory Changes To Commercial Relationship With Cuba  

A Significant Part Of What They Seek In Washington Await Decisions In Havana

Part Of What They Seek Is Already Authorized By The OFAC

Part Of What They Seek Is Not The Responsibility Of The USDA- It Is The Responsibility Of Those Who Advocated For It And Have Not Used It.  Whose Fault Is That?

They Should Also Send A Letter To Miguel Diaz-Canel, President Of The Republic Of Cuba

On 15 March 2023, three members of the United States Senate sent a three-page letter to Joseph Biden, 46th President of the United States:  Chris Van Hollen (D-Maryland), Ron Wyden (D- Oregon), Chairman of the Finance Committee, and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyoming).  LINK To Letter

Excerpt

“Small, private sector Cuban entrepreneurs have been clamoring for access to capital that could help their businesses thrive, support private sector employment, and make it less likely Cubans seek to migrate to the United States due to lack of hope for a better future. Rather than continue the failed policy of broad-based sanctions, your Administration should undertake efforts to increase economic exchange between the United States and the Cuban people. This should include risk-based, targeted efforts, including narrow changes to U.S. licensing and regulations, to support Cuba’s small and medium-sized private enterprises in accessing U.S. financial services to legitimate the Cuban private sector and facilitate its growth.”

On 10 May 2022 the Biden-Harris Administration (2021- ) authorized the first direct investment in and direct financing to a privately-owned company in the Republic of Cuba owned by a Republic of Cuba national. 

Unfortunately, the government of the Republic of Cuba has yet- two years and counting, to specifically authorize and publish regulations for the delivery of direct investment in and direct financing to a privately-owned company in the Republic of Cuba owned by a Republic of Cuba national.   

Excerpt

“Establish a targeted Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) license to allow U.S. banks to provide financial services to small, private sector Cuban businesses, potentially through Cuban banks, with appropriate risk management controls to prevent the flow of funds to entities controlled by the Cuban government. The licensing regime should include both payments activity and microfinancing of the private sector in Cuba, including agricultural cooperatives;”

The senators are correct that the absence of efficient banking for micro, small, and medium-size enterprises (MSMEs) constrains their operational efficiencies and their potential. 

The Biden-Harris Administration continues to refuse to authorize direct correspondent banking.  Incredulously, the Obama-Biden Administration (2009-2017) had authorized United States-based financial institutions to have correspondent accounts at financial institutions located in the Republic of Cuba, but did not authorize Republic of Cuba-based financial institutions to have correspondent accounts with financial institutions located in the United States. 

Absent direct correspondent banking and re-establishment of U-turn transactions for financial institutions located in the United States and in the Republic of Cuba, transactions relating to the export from the United States of authorized agricultural commodities, food products, healthcare products, and for authorized services- including the delivery when authorized by the government of the Republic of Cuba of MSME investment and financing, continue to require use of a financial institution located in a third country which adds time, cost, and lacks transparency. 

Helpful if the three senators would advocate to the government of the Republic of Cuba about the lack of MSME investment/financing regulations which, if issued, would address items referenced in the letter to President Biden   Implementing MSME investment/financing regulations would provide an incentive for the Biden-Harris Administration to authorize direct correspondent banking and U-turn transactions.

Excerpt

“Work with stakeholders to encourage the use of USDA’s Market Access Program (MAP) and Foreign Market Development (FMD) Program funds, authorized by the 2018 Farm Bill, to educate U.S. farmers and ranchers and facilitate the export of U.S. agricultural commodities to the Cuban market;”

In 2018, legislative advocates maintained that inserting a Market Access Program (MAP) and Foreign Market Development (FMD) provision in H.R. 2, the five-year Agriculture Improvement Act, known as the Farm Bill signed into law on 20 December 2018 by Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States was critical to “laying the groundwork” for increasing exports of agricultural commodities and food products to the Republic of Cuba.  Statements from members of the United States Congress included: “… an important first step to regaining our presence in Cuba.”    

Approximately seventy United States-based entities (primarily trade promotion organizations) annually are identified by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as receiving funding for MAP and approximately twenty entities are identified as receiving funding for FMD.   

Leading to the enactment of the 2018 Farm Bill, most observers reasonably concluded that legislative advocates- within the United States Congress and organizations in Washington DC and outside of the beltway would have prominently teed-up at least one high-profile applicant to publicize in advance they would use the provision if it became law or at least one high-profile applicant to immediately and publicly request funding when the 2018 Farm Bill became law on 21 December 2018.    

The most significant impact of an anemic number of MAP/FMD requests and usage in 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 is what the lack of interest portends for other legislative efforts in the United States Congress relating to the Republic of Cuba, particularly those focused upon changes to cash-in-advance payment terms for agricultural commodity and food product exports from the United States to the Republic of Cuba required by the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (TSREEA).  The question opponents will ask: “If authorizing MAP/FMD for Cuba was so important, why have so few organizations used it?”   

The cash-in-advance terms were supported by United States-based exporters while opposed by United States-based agricultural commodity and food product trade promotion organizations.  United States-based exporters were concerned in 2000 and remain concerned in 2023 that with Republic of Cuba government-operated entities maintaining a chronic inability to abide by payment terms other than cash-in-advance, more prudent to retain a perhaps smaller market share with no payment issues rather than a larger market share with endemic, and necessarily publicly-disclosed payment issues.    

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Links To Related Analyses

 U.S. Agricultural Commodity/Food Products Exports To Cuba Increased 48.7% In January; Cuba Ranked 52nd Of 207 Global Export Markets. US$45,110.00 In Waffles And Wafers Among Products Purchased. Mar 13, 2023

In The Olympics, 110-Meter Hurdle Race Has Ten Hurdles.  Senator Klobuchar's Reintroduced Cuba Legislation Has At Least Twelve In The United States Congress. Mar 9, 2023

Western Union Goes National For U.S. Tranfers To Cuba.... When Will Cuba Permit U.S. Investment And Financing For MSMEs In Cuba? No Excuse For Delays.  Mar 3, 2023  

Cuba Updates Regulations On Import, Sale, Transfer Of Vehicles, Including Electric Vehicles, For MSMEs And Individuals. Two Years And Waiting... No MSME Investment/Financing Delivery Regulations Feb 25, 2023  

Misleading Tweet By Biden-Harris Department Of State Emulates Trump-Pence Department Of State.  So Much For Wanting To Be Different.  Channeling Michael Kozak. Feb 25, 2023

Cuba Was 55th Largest Agricultural Commodity/Food Export Market In 2022. Increased 7.7% From 2021 To 2022; Up 40.2% In December 2021. Surprise: US$288,000.00 In Cigarettes From Tampa, Florida. Feb 9, 2023  

Better Informed, Richard Branson Could Provide Essential Value To MSMEs In Cuba, To Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Adminstration In Havana, And To Biden-Harris Administration In Washington Feb 15, 2023  

Why No Advance Or Post Visit Mention On State Of Delaware Internet Sites For Visit To Cuba By Secretaries Of Agriculture And State? Under-The-Radar Visits Are Not Helpful. February 14, 2023

Defining Anemic: In Five Years, 2018 Farm Bill USDA Provision For Cuba Had No Use Of FMD And Two Uses Of MAP. Approximately 90 U.S.-Based Entities Could Have Participated. That’s A 2.2% Use Rate. Feb 3, 2023  

Another Unpublicized U.S. Senator Visit To Cuba. Rather Than Focus On What Cuba Private Sector Needs From Cuba Government, He Focuses Upon What Cuba Private Sector Needs From U.S. Government. January 05, 2023 

Mr. de Cossio At MINREX In Cuba Not Quite Accurate With His Comments About Biden-Harris Administration Efforts With MSMEs And Remittances Dec 20, 2022  

If MSMEs Are Important To Cuba, Why Nearing Seven Months And No Regulations Authorizing Foreign Investment And Foreign Financing? Biden Administration And 6,000 MSMEs In Cuba Are Waiting. Nov 30, 2022  

Biden-Harris Administration Approves First Equity Investment Since 1960 In A Private Cuban Company May 10, 2022  

With U.S. Government Authorization For First Direct Equity Investment Into A Private Company In Cuba, Here Is Important Context And Details.  About The Parties; About The Message. May 16, 2022   

Ag Delegations Traveling To Cuba Must Know What Is Possible, Advocate To Government Of Cuba To Permit All That Is Permissible- Direct Export Of Coffee, Cacao, Honey. Complaining Not Constructive. April 14, 2022  

Might Cubaexport In 2020 Permit “Independent Entrepreneurs” To Export Coffee Beans, Cocoa and Honey To The United States? January 14, 2020  

Senator Klobuchar Could Be A Catalyst For Claims Or Her Candidacy Could Doom Her Legislation February 16, 2019

U.S. Federal Judge In Colorado Agrees To Enforce Part Of US$2.79 Billion Judgment Against Government Of Cuba For Torture.

Federal judge agrees to enforce part of $2.79 billion judgment against Cuba for torture, killing
Judge Nina Wang expressed uncertainty over how to proceed in the unique case against the government of Cuba

Civil Action No. 21-cv-02497-NYW-NRN: ALFREDO VILLOLDO, and GUSTAVO E. VILLOLDO, individually, and as Administrator, Executor, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos, Plaintiffs, v. THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA, Defendant.

Colorado Politics
Colorado Springs, Colorado
14 March 2023

By Michael Karlik

Two brothers who have attempted for years to collect on a $2.79 billion judgment against the Cuban government received a favorable ruling from a federal judge in Colorado, who largely accepted Cuba's liability for torturing and extrajudicially killing members of the Villoldo family. At the same time, U.S. District Court Judge Nina Y. Wang directed Alfredo and Gustavo E. Villoldo to explain what the "proper course of action" should now be, given the unusual nature of the brothers' case. "Despite this Court’s exhaustive independent research, the Court could not locate applicable authority directing the Court how to proceed in this instance," she wrote in a March 7 order.

The Villoldos asked Wang to confirm a Florida state judge's order that found the Cuban government liable under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, which permits lawsuits against countries designated as state sponsors of terrorism. The Villoldos indicated the Cuban government or its agents likely hold "substantial assets" in financial institutions within Colorado. Wang agreed she could enforce the judgment for the torture of Gustavo Villoldo and the 1959 killing of Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos, the father of the plaintiffs. But she did not believe Alfredo Villoldo's treatment by the Cuban government amounted to torture under the law. Cuba did not appear in the original case in Florida, nor did it respond to the Villoldos' federal complaint in Colorado. The Cuban embassy in Washington, D.C. did not immediately respond to a Spanish language inquiry about Wang's order.

The Villoldo brothers are U.S. citizens in their 80s whose family lived in Cuba during the Cuban Revolution's overthrow of the authoritarian government. Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos was a dual U.S. and Cuban citizen who studied in the United States and became a successful businessman upon his return to Cuba. The family's story was the subject of testimony in the Florida case. When Fidel Castro and the Cuban revolutionaries gained control of the government in 1959, they quickly targeted the Villoldo family because of its wealth and American ties. Soldiers abducted the younger Gustavo Villoldo and took him to the "Sports Palace," where they withheld food and water, interrogated him and staged "mock executions," before finally releasing him. His father, Gustavo Villoldo Arilagos, met with revolutionary Ernesto "Che" Guevara in February 1959, during which Guevara threated to kill the Villoldo family unless the elder Villoldo surrendered his assets and took his life. Early the next morning, Gustavo Villoldo Arilagos died by suicide.

In 2011, Gustavo and Alfredo Villoldo filed suit in Miami-Dade County for emotional distress, economic loss and wrongful death. The defendant, Cuba, did not respond to or appear in the case. The litigation also raised Cuba's attempts through 2003 to assassinate or threaten to assassinate Gustavo Villoldo in Miami. Circuit Court Judge Beatrice Butchko sided with the brothers. She later amended her order in 2021, which awarded $2.79 billion to the Villoldos.

"This Court found that the torture inflicted by the Defendants began in January 1959 with the imprisonment and physical torture of the Villoldos that led to the suicide of Mr. Villoldo and the theft of the Villoldos' enormous wealth by the Republic of Cuba," Butchko wrote, "which was then used by Cuba to fund its efforts to support terrorism in Latin America and around the world."

The brothers then embarked on an effort to enforce Butchko's order in multiple federal courts, using the "full faith and credit" clause of the U.S. Constitution. Despite the Villoldos' efforts to serve the Cuban government with notice of the lawsuit, an effort that required the intervention of the State Department, Cuba did not respond to the brothers' filing in Colorado.

Wang performed her own legal analysis of the brothers' claims under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. Although her findings were similar to Butchko's, they were not identical. Under the law, countries are not immune from being sued over acts of torture or extrajudicial killing under specific circumstances. They must be designated as state sponsors of terrorism "as a result" of their injury-causing actions, among other things. Relying on statements from academics and those with personal knowledge of the Reagan administration's 1982 designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism, Wang was convinced the label was "a result" of Cuba's targeting of citizens with U.S. ties. "We decided to designate Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism to highlight and punish Cuba for these domestic and foreign abuses," testified Davis Rowland Robinson, a State Department official during the early 1980s, speaking about the Villodos' case.

Wang further found Gustavo Villoldo's treatment amounted to torture and the elder Gustavo Villoldo Arilagos' suicide was an act of the government, following Guevara's threat on his life. "This threat came after months of harassment targeting the Villoldo family and the imprisonment of Gustavo and Alfredo (including the torture of Gustavo), and was made in a time during which revolutionary agents were targeting individuals with ties to the United States and executing Cuban citizens and residents," Wang wrote. However, she did not believe Alfredo Villoldo's treatment fell under the legal definition of torture.

Because Butchko's multibillion-dollar award to the brothers included the improper finding that Alfredo Villoldo suffered torture, Wang noted that portion of the decision was "likely void." She was unable to find guidance from other courts about what to do under such circumstances and invited the plaintiffs to suggest a course of action. Lawyers for the Villoldos did not immediately respond to questions about what they will request that Wang do next, but attorney Charles B. Rosenberg called Wang's order an "important development in our clients’ years-long efforts to hold Cuba responsible for its heinous acts of terrorism."

LINK TO ORDER ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT (3/7/23) Villoldo et al. v. The Republic of Cuba.

U.S. Agricultural Commodity/Food Products Exports To Cuba Increased 48.7% In January; Cuba Ranked 52nd Of 207 Global Export Markets. US$45,110.00 In Waffles And Wafers Among Products Purchased.

ECONOMIC EYE ON CUBA©
March 2023

January 2023 Ag/Food Exports To Cuba Increase 48.7%- 1
52nd Of 207 January 2023 U.S. Food/Ag Export Markets- 2
2021 To 2022 Year-To-Year Exports Increase 7.7%- 2
Cuba Ranked 52nd Of U.S. 2023 Ag/Food Export Markets- 2
January 2023 Healthcare Product Exports US$0.00- 2
January 2023 Humanitarian Donations US$1,087,266.00- 3
Obama Administration Initiatives Exports Continue- 3
U.S. Port Export Data- 17

JANUARY 2023 FOOD/AG EXPORTS TO CUBA INCREASE 48.7%- Exports of food products and agricultural commodities from the United States to the Republic of Cuba in January 2023 were US$32,394,196.00 compared to US$21,783,159.00 in January 2022 and US$19,018,549.00 in January 2021. 

January 2023 exports included among other items: Waffles and Wafers; Sweet Biscuits; Phosphates; Flour; Toilet Paper; Woodpulp; Chick Leg Quarters (Frozen); Chicken Meat (Frozen); Chicken Legs (Frozen); Meat of Swine; Preserved Chicken Meat; Non-Alcoholic Beverages.

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

Eight Senators, Two Representatives Supporting Trademark Legislation To Benefit Bacardi. But, Does Legislation Help Resolve 5,913 Certified Claims Against Cuba?

“Menendez, Rubio, Issa, Wasserman Schultz Lead Renewed Effort to Ban U.S. Courts from Enforcing Trademarks Stolen by the Cuban Regime.  This bicameral, bipartisan bill would protect the interests and rights of entrepreneurs who had their assets illegally seized by the Cuban regime.” 

WASHINGTON, D.C. (9 March 2023) – U.S. Senators Bob Menendez (D-N.J.), Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and senior member of the Senate Finance Committee, and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee for the Western Hemisphere, today reintroduced the bicameral, bipartisan No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act. Joining the Senators in presenting this legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives are Representatives Darrell Issa (R-Calif.-48) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.-25). This bill would prohibit U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from recognizing, enforcing, or otherwise validating any assertion of rights by an individual of a trademark used in connection with a business or assets confiscated by the Cuban regime, unless the original owner of the trademark expressly consented to the transfer of the trademark. 

“Any confiscation or seizure of assets by the Cuban regime is and will always be a criminal act that should not be rewarded by the U.S. government,” said Sen. Menendez. “This legislation would codify into law longstanding U.S. policy of supporting rightful owners of stolen property by guaranteeing that American courts and the executive branch only recognize the rights of those whose trademarks were illegally taken by the Cuban government.” 

“There is bipartisan support to protect Americans who had property stolen by the Cuban regime. For years, the Cuban dictatorship has benefited from the confiscation of property. We must ensure that federal agencies and U.S. courts will not recognize, or validate any trademark rights that were illegally stolen from the rightful owners by the Cuban regime,” said Sen. Rubio. 

“This legislation is about more than one circumstance. It is the righting of a historical wrong and clear acknowledgement of the inherent value of intellectual property and the inviolable ownership of one’s ideas and creations,” said Rep. Issa. “This legislation makes a technical correction to our law, but one that will ensure that the protections of our laws apply to all parties claiming U.S. rights to confiscated Cuban trademarks – regardless of nationality.” 

“We are obligated to protect American companies who have been victimized by intellectual property theft and fraud, especially at the hands of adversarial foreign governments,” said Rep. Wasserman Schultz. “This legislation prohibits U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from validating an assertion of trademark rights in connection with a business or assets confiscated by the Cuban government. I hope my colleagues on both sides of the aisle will join us in reaffirming that the United States will not tolerate trademarks being held hostage.” 

The No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act would prohibit the use of a trademark when the individual asserting trademark rights knew or had reason to know at the time of acquisition that the trademark was the same or substantially similar to the trademark or name used in connection with a U.S. business or asset confiscated by the Cuban government. 

For example, in 1994, a Cuban rum-maker, Cuba Ron, filed for and received a U.S. trademark on the name “Havana Club,” named after a club that the Cuban regime seized in 1959. Around the same time Cuba Ron filed for a trademark, Bacardí, one of the world’s largest liquor producers based in Puerto Rico, purchased the trademark and recipe from descendants of the original Havana Club founder and owner. This legislation would prohibit Cuba Ron and its partner, Pernod Ricard, from exercising rights related to Havana Club given that the Cuban regime illegally seized it, and thus allowing Bacardi to use the trademark it rightly owns. 

Joining Sens. Menendez and Rubio in the Senate in cosponsoring this legislation are Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii), and Todd Young (R-Ind.). 

LINK: Text Of S.746
LINK: Libertad Act Title III Lawsuit Filing Statistics

https://www.menendez.senate.gov/newsroom/press/menendez-rubio-issa-wasserman-schultz-lead-renewed-effort-to-ban-us-courts-from-enforcing-trademarks-stolen-by-the-cuban-regime 

https://www.menendez.senate.gov/es/noticias/prensa/menendez-rubio-wasserman-schultz-issa-renuevan-esfuerzo-legislativo-para-prohibir-que-cortes-de-estados-unidos-reconozcan-marcas-comerciales-robadas-por-el-regimen-cubano 

BACARDI & COMPANY LIMITED, and BACARDI U.S.A., INC., Plaintiffs, v. EMPRESA CUBANA EXPORTADORA DE ALIMENTOS Y PRODUCTOS VARIOS d/b/a CUBAEXPORT, and HAVANA CLUB HOLDING, S.A., d/b/a HCH, S.A., Defendants. 

LINK: Order (3/6/23)- United States District Court For The District Of Colombia 

“For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 122 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; and it is further ORDERED that Defendants’ Partial Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 124, is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED that all Counts against Havana Club Holding, S.A. d/b/a/HCH, S.A., are DISMISSED.” 

LINK: Memorandum Opinion (3/6/23)- United States District Court For The District Of Colombia  

“Upon careful consideration of the motions, oppositions, and replies thereto, and for the reasons explained below, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 122, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF No. 124, is DENIED.”

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT

In The Olympics, 110-Meter Hurdle Race Has Ten Hurdles.  Senator Klobuchar's Reintroduced Cuba Legislation Has At Least Twelve In The United States Congress.

Before Changing United States Laws, Senator Klobuchar And Her Co-Sponsors Need To Convince Cuba Government To Expand Opportunities For Micro, Small, And Medium-size Enterprises (MSMEs) And Make Commercial Infrastructure Regulatory Changes. 

Cuba Needs To Authorize Direct Investment In And Direct Financing To MSMEs Which Biden-Harris Administration Authorized In May 2022. 

United States Exporters- Those Companies Actually Exporting Agricultural Commodities And Food Products From The United States To Cuba Do Not Want To Extend Payment Terms To Cuba. Banks Do Not Want To Provide Financing. That’s A Problem For Legislation. Who Will Use Changes?

In The Olympics, The 110-Meter Hurdle Race Has Ten Hurdles.  New Cuba Legislation Has At Least Twelve In The United States Congress. 

LINK: Cuba Was 55th Largest Agricultural Commodity/Food Export Market In 2022. Increased 7.7% From 2021 To 2022; Up 40.2% In December 2021. Surprise: US$288,000.00 In Cigarettes From Tampa, Florida. Feb 9, 2023  

One: “[W]e fully support Moscow’s position that the conflict in Ukraine was deliberately provoked by the West and NATO, and we understand that Russia was forced to launch a special operation.” 

  • From Miami Herald: “Vladimir Putin’s top security adviser and close ally, Gen. Nikolai Patrushev, the Russian Security Council secretary, met with Cuba’s leader Raúl Castro and the country’s appointed president, Miguel Díaz-Canel, in Havana on Wednesday to discuss “security cooperation.”  Also present was Lázaro Alberto Álvarez Casas, the head of Cuba’s Ministry of the Interior, which oversees the country’s various intelligence agencies, the police and border guard. In his strongest statement yet, Díaz-Canel told Patrushev that “we fully support Moscow’s position that the conflict in Ukraine was deliberately provoked by the West and NATO, and we understand that Russia was forced to launch a special operation,” according to Rossiyskaya Gazeta, the official Russian government newspaper.  Díaz-Canel’s statement did not appear in Cuban state media, which also did not disclose a visit by Patrushev and members of his staff to the Interior Ministry’s headquarters, which Rossiyskaya Gazeta reported.” 

Two: LINK- Despite Government Of Cuba Seeking US$1 Trillion In Reparations From The United States, It Opposed UN Resolution To Seek Reparations From Russia For Ukraine November 15, 2022 

Three Through Twelve: Robert Menendez (D- New Jersey), Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the United States Senate.  Senator Menendez is of Cuban descent along with Marco Rubio (R- Florida) and Ted Cruz (R- Texas).  In the United States House of Representatives, members of Cuban descent are: Mario Díaz-Balart (R-Florida), Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-Florida), Carlos Giménez (R-Florida), Nicole Malliotakis (R-New York), Alex Mooney (R-West Virginia), María Elvira Salazar (R-Florida), and Robert Menendez Jr. (D-New Jersey), son of Senator Robert Menendez.  Representative Salazar is the Chair of the Subcommittee on Western Hemisphere of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the United States House of Representatives. 

On 2 March 2023, Amy Klobuchar (D- Minnesota) submitted S. 653, “A bill to lift the trade embargo on Cuba” which was referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the United States Senate.  The initial co-sponsors were Jerry Moran (Republican, Kansas), Christopher Murphy (Democrat, Connecticut), Roger Marshall (Republican, Kansas), and Elizabeth Warren (Democrat, Massachusetts). 

  • “Text: S.653 — 118th Congress (2023-2024) All Information (Except Text).  As of 03/08/2023 text has not been received for S.653 - A bill to lift the trade embargo to Cuba.  Bills are generally sent to the Library of Congress from GPO, the Government Publishing Office, a day or two after they are introduced on the floor of the House or Senate. Delays can occur when there are a large number of bills to prepare or when a very large bill has to be printed.” 

  • LINK To Text Of S. 653 

Klobuchar, Moran, Murphy, Marshall, Warren Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Lift Trade Embargo on Cuba.  The Freedom to Export to Cuba Act would create new economic opportunities for American businesses and farmers by boosting U.S. exports and allowing Cubans greater access to American goods 

6 March 2023: WASHINGTON - U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Jerry Moran (R-KS), Chris Murphy (D-CT), Roger Marshall (R-KS), and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) reintroduced bipartisan legislation to lift the Cuba trade embargo. The Freedom to Export to Cuba Act would eliminate legal barriers preventing Americans from doing business in Cuba and create new economic opportunities by boosting U.S. exports and allowing Cubans greater access to American goods. The legislation repeals key provisions of existing laws that block Americans from doing business in Cuba, but keeps in place laws that address human rights or property claims against the Cuban government.   

“I have long pushed to reform our relationship with Cuba, which for decades has been defined by conflicts of the past instead of looking toward the future,” said Klobuchar. “By ending the trade embargo with Cuba once and for all, our bipartisan legislation will turn the page on the failed policy of isolation while creating a new export market and generating economic opportunities for American businesses.”  

“The unilateral trade embargo on Cuba blocks our own farmers, ranchers and manufacturers from selling into a market only 90 miles from our shoreline, while foreign competitors benefit at our expense,” said Moran. “This legislation will expand market opportunities for U.S. producers by allowing them to compete on a level playing field with other countries. It is time to amend our own laws to give U.S. producers fair access to market to consumers in Cuba.” 

“We can expand opportunities for American businesses and farmers to trade with Cuba while still holding the Cuban government accountable for its human rights record. This bipartisan legislation is a smart fix that will create American jobs and benefit the Cuban people,” said Murphy.   

“I’m proud to sign onto the Freedom to Export to Cuba Act. It’s important for the United States to boost our economic opportunities and increase market access for American-made goods. Repealing the current legal restrictions and trade embargo on Cuba allows for Kansas farmers, ranchers and manufacturers to expand their businesses to Cuba and opens the door to a large export market, while leaving in place measures to address human rights abuses,” said Marshall

“It is long past time for us to normalize relations with Cuba,” said Warren. “This legislation takes important steps to remove barriers for U.S. trade and relations between our two countries and moves us in the right direction by increasing economic opportunities for Americans and the Cuban people.” 

The Freedom to Export to Cuba Act repeals the current legal restrictions against doing business with Cuba, including the original 1961 authorization for establishing the trade embargo; subsequent laws that required enforcement of the embargo; and other restrictive statutes that prohibit transactions between U.S.-owned or controlled firms and Cuba, and limitations on direct shipping between U.S. and Cuban ports.  Cuba relies on agricultural imports to feed the 11 million people who live there and the approximately 4 million tourists who visited in 2019 prior to the pandemic. The U.S. International Trade Commission found that if restrictions on trade with Cuba had been lifted, exports like wheat, rice, corn, and soybeans could increase by 166 percent within five years to a total of about $800 million. 

LINK TO COMPLETE TEXT IN PDF FORMAT

Links To Related Analyses 

Western Union Goes National For U.S. Tranfers To Cuba.... When Will Cuba Permit U.S. Investment And Financing For MSMEs In Cuba? No Excuse For Delays.  Mar 3, 2023  

Cuba Updates Regulations On Import, Sale, Transfer Of Vehicles, Including Electric Vehicles, For MSMEs And Individuals. Two Years And Waiting... No MSME Investment/Financing Delivery Regulations Feb 25, 2023  

Cuba Was 55th Largest Agricultural Commodity/Food Export Market In 2022. Increased 7.7% From 2021 To 2022; Up 40.2% In December 2021. Surprise: US$288,000.00 In Cigarettes From Tampa, Florida. Feb 9, 2023  

Defining Anemic: In Five Years, 2018 Farm Bill USDA Provision For Cuba Had No Use Of FMD And Two Uses Of MAP. Approximately 90 U.S.-Based Entities Could Have Participated. That’s A 2.2% Use Rate. Feb 3, 2023  

Another Unpublicized U.S. Senator Visit To Cuba. Rather Than Focus On What Cuba Private Sector Needs From Cuba Government, He Focuses Upon What Cuba Private Sector Needs From U.S. Government. January 05, 2023 

Mr. de Cossio At MINREX In Cuba Not Quite Accurate With His Comments About Biden-Harris Administration Efforts With MSMEs And Remittances Dec 20, 2022  

If MSMEs Are Important To Cuba, Why Nearing Seven Months And No Regulations Authorizing Foreign Investment And Foreign Financing? Biden Administration And 6,000 MSMEs In Cuba Are Waiting. Nov 30, 2022  

Biden-Harris Administration Approves First Equity Investment Since 1960 In A Private Cuban Company May 10, 2022  

With U.S. Government Authorization For First Direct Equity Investment Into A Private Company In Cuba, Here Is Important Context And Details.  About The Parties; About The Message. May 16, 2022   

Ag Delegations Traveling To Cuba Must Know What Is Possible, Advocate To Government Of Cuba To Permit All That Is Permissible- Direct Export Of Coffee, Cacao, Honey. Complaining Not Constructive. April 14, 2022  

Might Cubaexport In 2020 Permit “Independent Entrepreneurs” To Export Coffee Beans, Cocoa and Honey To The United States? January 14, 2020  

Senator Klobuchar Could Be A Catalyst For Claims Or Her Candidacy Could Doom Her Legislation February 16, 2019

Government Of Cuba Needs To Work With Consulates In Havana So They Accept Only Cuban Pesos As Payment For Services- And Then May Convert Them To Other Currencies If Desired.

From CiberCuba

As of April 2023, the United States embassy in Havana will no longer accept payment for consular services in Cuban pesos, according to a note posted on Twitter.  Instead, only cash US dollars will be accepted for services such as visa processing, notary services and credit.  

Embassies are authorized to accept only one currency to compensate for the monetary cost of consular services that are financed through fees.  This policy change is often implemented when the available trade rates do not allow a fair trade between the dollar and local currencies.  This policy could not accept Cuban pesos as it could affect the exchange of currency in the Cuban market.  This decision is not unique to the US embassy in Havana, as other embassies have had to decide how much money they will receive for their merits.  

In June 2022, the embassies of Panama and Ecuador temporarily suspended consular services in Havana in order to receive the money in which they were to receive the payment, according to an instruction from the Central Bank of Cuba (BCC).  In addition, the Brazilian embassy in Havana announced that users can only pay for their services by bank transfer or deposit in convertible currency.  

In response to these decisions, the BCC announced that embassies and consulates cannot transfer funds to convertible currency accounts or make extra payments, and must determine how they receive payment on merit. They are given options to choose between the Cuban peso or convertible currencies (MLC).

Western Union Goes National For U.S. Transfers To Cuba.... When Will Cuba Permit U.S. Investment And Financing For MSMEs In Cuba? No Excuse For Delays.

“… But for that to happen, the Cuban government also needs to issue regulations establishing a clear path for foreign investment in the private sector, said John Kavulich, president of the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council, who last year received authorization from the Treasury Department to invest and provide financing to a Cuban private business.”

The [Miguel] Díaz-Canel administration in Havana needs to now implement what it has reiterated for two years would be permitted: that small and medium private enterprises receive direct investment and direct financing from sources in the United States,” he said. “There is no valid reason for more stalling and depriving those private enterprises of resources they desperately need and the Biden-Harris administration has already authorized.”” Miami Herald, 2 March 2023

Western Union Expands Initial Test Service from the United States to Cuba
March 02, 2023

Pilot program now includes more than 4,400 retail locations across all 50 United States
Digital service now available over WesternUnion.com or the Western Union mobile app
Money can be received electronically into accounts at three major Cuban banks


DENVER--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Western Union (NYSE: WU) today announced a major expansion of its pilot program providing money transfer services from the U.S. to Cuba.  The initial test phase of the pilot program, launched on January 4, included send service from a select group of U.S. retail locations in the Greater Miami area. Today, it has grown to more than 4,400 retail locations across the United States and Puerto Rico, as well as the availability of digital send service from WesternUnion.com and the Western Union mobile app.  Currently, customers can send money from the U.S. to receivers with bank and debit card accounts at the following banks in Cuba: Banco Popular de Ahorro, Banco Metropolitano S.A. and Banco de Credito y Comercio (Bandec).  To process transactions to Cuba, Western Union signed an agreement with Orbit S.A. who received authorization from the Central Bank of Cuba in February 2022 as a non-banking financial institution to process money transfers to the island.

Service Details

Funds can be received into bank accounts and debit cards only. Service is limited to consumer money transfers only. U.S. customers can remit up to USD2,000.00 per transaction by presenting valid government-issued identification.  Money will be available for receipt same day if sent prior to Noon U.S. Eastern Time. Remittances sent after Noon U.S. Eastern Time will be available the next business day.  Service is available to receivers with Carnet de Identidad IDs and bank and/or debit card accounts at the following banks in Cuba: Banco Popular de Ahorro, Banco Metropolitano S.A. and Banco de Credito y Comercio (Bandec).  Customers cannot send funds to their own MLC bank accounts/debit cards in Cuba.  Deposits are available in U.S. dollar currency only, which has the same equivalency to the Cuban Moneda Libremente Convertible (MLC).  The company has plans to expand the program further this year.

About Western Union

The Western Union Company (NYSE: WU) is committed to helping people around the world who aspire to build financial futures for themselves, their loved ones and their communities. Our leading cross-border, cross-currency money movement, payments and digital financial services empower consumers, businesses, financial institutions and governments—across more than 200 countries and territories and nearly 130 currencies—to connect with billions of bank accounts, millions of digital wallets and cards, and a global footprint of hundreds of thousands of retail locations. Our goal is to offer accessible financial services that help people and communities prosper. For more information, visit www.westernunion.com

Libertad Act Lawsuit Against Iberostar Of Spain Returns To Circuit Court. International Comity Does Not Tolerate Inaction For Three Years. Iberostar, IHG Forge Alliance- Except Cuba Properties.

International Comity: Defendant must obey European Commission (EC) blocking statute.
United State Comity: Defendant caught between two different laws.

United States Circuit Court rightly provided time for EC to determine its position.  However, waiting three years was too long.  Appeals Court ruled Circuit Court abused discretion- no judge wants to be labeled in that manner.  International comity does not tolerate inaction for years.

MARIA DOLORES CANTO MARTI, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF DOLORES MARTI MERCADE AND FERNANDO CANTO BORY V. IBEROSTAR HOTELES Y APARTAMENTOS SL [1:20-cv-20078; Southern Florida District; 21-11906 11th Circuit Court of Appeals]

Zumpano Patricios P.A. (plaintiff)
Bird & Bird (defendant)
Holland & Knight (defendant)

First Amended Complaint (2/24/23)
Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint And Memorandum Of Law (1/11/23)
Libertad Act Lawsuit Filing Statistics

02/28/2023- Joint SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Enrique Canto Marti, Fernando Jose Ignacio Canto Marti, Graciela Maria Canto Marti, Javier Enrique Canto Marti, Maria Dolores Canto Marti, Roberto Jose Canto Marti (Patricios, Leon) (Entered: 02/28/2023)
02/24/2023- PAPERLESS ORDER: denying as moot the Defendant's motion to dismiss. 68 . The Plaintiff's amended complaint moots the motion to dismiss the prior pleading. See Taylor v. Alabama, 275 F. App'x 836, 838 (11th Cir. 2008) (noting that when the plaintiffs amended their complaint the defendants' motion to dismiss became moot). Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. (cst) (Entered: 02/24/2023)
02/24/2023- First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Iberostar Hoteles Y Apartamentos SL, filed by Maria Dolores Canto Marti, Enrique Canto Marti, Fernando Jose Ignacio Canto Marti, Javier Enrique Canto Marti, Roberto Jose Canto Marti, Graciela Maria Canto Marti. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6)(Zumpano, Joseph) (Entered: 02/24/2023)
02/21/2023- Scheduling Order and Order of Referral to Mediation: ( Jury Trial set for 2/12/2024 before Judge Robert N. Scola Jr.., Calendar Call set for 2/6/2024 09:00 AM in Miami Division before Judge Robert N. Scola Jr..), ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr on 2/21/2023. See attached document for full details. (cds) Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here. (Entered: 02/21/2023)
01/23/2023- Reset Deadline. Amended Complaint due by 2/24/2023. PER DE#70 (cds) (Entered: 01/24/2023)

Excerpt From First Amended Complaint

Iberostar’s main website, Iberostar.com (which includes derivative websites such as booking.iberostar.com and booking.iberostarvacation.com)—copyrighted by Iberostar—is interactive, capable of e-business and reaching the world, and accessible in the United States (including Florida). At a minimum, prior to the filing of the Original Complaint, U.S. residents, including Floridians, could access Iberostar’s website and book hotel accommodations at the Iberostar Imperial Hotel (which is on and part of the Subject Property). Moreover, at a minimum, prior to the filing of the Original Complaint, U.S. residents, including Floridians, could determine availability of hotel rooms at the Iberostar Imperial Hotel (which is on and part of the Subject Property) on their preferred dates, the applicable pricing, and the available room features (e.g. type of room, air conditioning, bathroom tub or shower), and reserve a room by using, upon information and belief, a U.S. credit card. See Composite Exhibit 1, Iberostar Screenshots.

The Subject Property has not been the subject of a certified claim under Title V of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949 (22 U.S.C. § 1643 et seq.), nor has the claim to the Subject Property been settled pursuant to any settlement procedure. More specifically, Plaintiffs’ interest to the Subject Property is not the subject of a certified claim. Moreover, the remaining interest to the Subject Property (held by Rosa Canto Bory’s heirs and Rosa Zumpano’s heirs) is not the subject of a certified claim. 13 71. The value of Plaintiffs’ claim is well in excess of the Act’s $50,000.00 requirement. See 22 U.S.C. §6082(b). 72. Based on the aforementioned, Plaintiffs are entitled to all relief available under the Act, including actual damages, treble damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, pursuant to 22 U.S.C. § 6082.

From Previous Plaintiff Filing: “1 On December 14, 2022, Iberostar Spain received a Commission Implementing Decision from the European Commission (“Decision”) on its application for authorization to respond to the Complaint in this action. In the Decision the European Commission authorized Iberostar Spain to move to dismiss this action, and specifically stated: “In the framework of such an exceptional authorisation, the Commission finds it relevant to make the following points: (a) The Commission recalls that the extra-territorial application of sanctions is an outright violation of international public law . . . . Therefore, the Commission considers that it would be against international law for the U.S. Court to exercise jurisdiction over the Applicant and an action in U.S. courts supporting such a claim is in the Union interest. (b) It is also in the Union’s interests that the U.S. Court has all the necessary elements at its disposal in order to declare its own lack of jurisdiction. This is not only desirable from a legal standpoint but it is also necessary in order to achieve the general policy objectives of Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 and protect the Applicant. U.S. courts have already dismissed other Helms-Burton lawsuits on jurisdictional grounds. (c) It is also in the Union’s interests that this case adds to the existing case law where U.S. courts dismiss Helms-Burton claims on lack of personal jurisdiction. In particular, the Commission considers it important that a default judgment in this case does not result in the creation of case law that is contrary to the interests of EU operators . . . .” The Decision expressed a need to build on the U.S. doctrine of international comity, while emphasizing that this Court does not have jurisdiction over Defendant, and it should restrain from exercising jurisdiction.”

21 November 2022
IHG and Iberostar sign a strategic alliance for resort and all-inclusive hotels in the Caribbean, Americas, Southern Europe and North Africa

InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG or the Company) and Iberostar Hotels & Resorts (Iberostar) announce today a long term commercial agreement for resort and all-inclusive hotels. Iberostar is a family-run business based in Palma de Mallorca, Spain, with more than 65 years’ experience in the hospitality industry, an excellent reputation for operating resorts in outstanding locations, and a strong commitment to quality and sustainability. Through this strategic alliance, Iberostar will retain 100% ownership, preserving its autonomy and values. Up to 70 hotels (24.3k rooms) will be added to IHG’s system under the Iberostar Beachfront Resorts brand, which will become the 18th brand for IHG. This will boost IHG’s global system size by up to 3%. The first properties set to join the IHG system this December will give IHG guests increased choice in sought-after locations including Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Brazil and the Canary Islands (Spain). Further properties in Spain and other popular resort destinations in Southern Europe and North Africa are anticipated to join IHG’s system over the course of 2023 and 2024.

IHG guests will be able to look forward to memorable stays in award-winning hotels*, ranging from family friendly premium offerings to adult only luxury, in leading resort destinations, including: Iberostar Grand Paraiso (Riviera Maya, Mexico); Iberostar Selection Hacienda Dominicus (Bayahibe, Dominican Republic); Iberostar Grand Rose Hall (Montego Bay, Jamaica); and Iberostar Selection Anthelia (Tenerife, Spain). These add to IHG’s existing 260 resort properties that span brands including Six Senses, Regent, InterContinental, Kimpton, Hotel Indigo, Crowne Plaza, Holiday Inn and Holiday Inn Club Vacations. IHG has fewer than 20 resort properties in the countries where the Iberostar Beachfront Resorts properties are located. The agreement therefore significantly increases and broadens IHG’s resort footprint. The portfolio of Iberostar properties will gain access to IHG’s enterprise platform, including its distribution channels and the IHG One Rewards loyalty programme with more than 100 million members. IHG in turn will increase awareness of its current brands with a new set of travellers, and meet a clear desire from guests and loyalty members for more resort destinations and the option of all-inclusive stays.

In what is a large and high growth market segment, demand for resort and all-inclusive stays has been buoyed by increasing traveller desire for high quality experiences and stress-free holidays, particularly post-Covid, and the ability to access such stays as part of loyalty programme membership. The breadth of resort choices for travellers has also increased in recent years, with luxury and upper upscale destinations creating more wellbeing and sustainability-led experiences that tailor to changing guest expectations. Iberostar and IHG share many company values, including a passion for sustainability and responsible tourism, with Iberostar’s pioneering Wave of Change movement outlining clear aims to move towards a circular economy, promote the responsible consumption of seafood and improve coastal health. As part of the agreement, IHG will work with Iberostar to create opportunities for joint sustainability initiatives that align with IHG’s 2030 Journey to Tomorrow responsible business plan. The Iberostar Beachfront Resorts brand will be included in a new Exclusive Partners category in IHG’s brand portfolio, which will sit alongside its Suites, Essentials, Premium and Luxury & Lifestyle categories.

Keith Barr, Chief Executive Officer, IHG Hotels & Resorts, said: “As we continue to expand the footprint of our world famous brands, we are always looking at exciting, sustainable growth opportunities in areas that can further enhance our offer for guests and owners. Guests have told us of their wish for increased choice of resort and all-inclusive destinations within our brand portfolio. We are delighted to address that by working with such a well-respected, experienced and like-minded partner as Iberostar, and to see more amazing hotels join our system that continues IHG’s growth in so many of the world’s most attractive markets and destinations. Iberostar has successfully developed a leading presence in beachfront and all-inclusive properties in the Caribbean, Americas, Southern Europe and North Africa over many decades, and we are excited about the opportunities to further grow the brand’s footprint together. This agreement increases IHG’s system by up to 3%, which helps to deliver on our ambitions for system growth. We continue to explore further opportunities for growth with exclusive partners, demonstrating the strengths and attractiveness of IHG’s enterprise platform.”

Sabina Fluxá, Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Iberostar Group, commented: “With this agreement, we set the path to continue the outstanding growth that began 40 years ago with the creation of the Iberostar brand and which has positioned us among the top resort brands in the world. The alliance with IHG combines our strengths, represents a decisive step forward in the distribution of Iberostar’s beachfront resorts, and reinforces our position as a benchmark in responsible tourism. By working together we will grow our portfolio and we are really looking forward to hosting IHG loyalty members in our collection of premium and luxury beachfront resorts and all-inclusive properties.”

Miguel Fluxá, Chairman, Iberostar Group, added: “This strategic alliance will enable Iberostar Beachfront Resorts to benefit from IHG’s industry-leading technology, deep skills and global scale. Retaining 100% ownership of Iberostar allows us to continue to generate differentiation in the hospitality industry with a long-term vision for our employees, clients, tour operators, distribution partners and local communities that have been loyal to us during all these years. We will continue to stay true to who we are, preserving our philosophies and values of quality and sustainability.”

Further details on the agreement and financial overview:
•    The agreement gives IHG a licence to the Iberostar Beachfront Resorts brand. The agreement has an initial term of 30 years and the option to renew for additional terms of 20 years upon mutual agreement.
•    The agreement is expected to add up to 24.3k rooms across 70 properties to IHG’s system over the next two years. Of these, 27 properties (8.2k rooms) still require additional approvals from third parties in order to join IHG. The total of up to 70 properties would be equivalent to growth of 2.8% on IHG’s global estate of 880.3k rooms at the start of 2022. The first rooms are expected to come into IHG’s system in December this year, with these representing approximately half of the total rooms subject to the overall agreement.
•    The 70 properties are all beachfront resorts. They exclude Iberostar’s other operations, such as its smaller portfolio of urban hotels, and also exclude Iberostar’s interests in Cuba. The approximate geographic split of revenues from the selected portfolio of 70 hotels in 2019 was: Mexico 22%; Dominican Republic 13%; Jamaica 8%; Brazil 5%; Spain 40%; other EMEAA region locations 12%.
•    A pipeline of six further Iberostar Beachfront Resorts properties, representing ~3k rooms, is also expected to be added to IHG’s pipeline. This pipeline will increase as IHG and Iberostar work together to grow the brand’s footprint through the long-term commercial agreement.
•    The total gross revenue of the existing portfolio of 70 hotels was approximately $1.3bn in 2019, equivalent to growth of over 4% on IHG’s $27.9bn of total gross revenue. Under the agreement, IHG will receive marketing, distribution, technology and other fees in a manner similar to its existing asset light model.
•    IHG’s fee structure will ramp-up over a period through to 2025 as the hotels increasingly integrate onto IHG’s platform. By 2027, representing year five of the agreement, annual revenue recognised within IHG’s fee business is expected to be in excess of $40m, with a broadly similar amount additionally recognised within System Fund revenues.
•    Reflecting integration investment, the net impact on IHG’s operating profit from reportable segments is expected to be modestly negative in 2022 and 2023. It is then expected to turn positive in 2024, before ramping up significantly from 2025 with the final step up in the fee structure and the expected shift in distribution channel mix.

Cuba Included Again In U.S. Deparment Of State Country Reports On Terrorism (CRT).

Release of the 2021 Country Reports on Terrorism

Office of the Spokesperson 

Today, the Department of State issued the 2021 Country Reports on Terrorism (CRT), which provide a detailed look at the counterterrorism environment in 2021.  Each year, the CRT provides insight on important issues in the fight against terrorism and helps the United States make informed decisions about policies, programs, and resource allocations as we seek to build counterterrorism capacity and resilience around the globe.  The 2021 CRT is available on the Department’s website. 

On January 12, 2021, the Department of State designated Cuba as a State Sponsor of Terrorism. The Secretary determined that the Cuban government repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism in granting safe harbor to terrorists. 

Cuba was previously designated as a State Sponsor of Terrorism in 1982 because of its long history of providing advice, safe haven, communications, training, and financial support to guerrilla groups and individual terrorists. 

Cuba’s designation was rescinded in 2015 after a thorough review found that Cuba met the statutory criteria for rescission.  In 2021, the Secretary of State determined that Cuba had repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism since its State Sponsor of Terrorism designation had been rescinded in 2015.  Citing peace negotiation protocols, Cuba refused Colombia’s request to extradite 10 ELN leaders living in Havana after that group claimed responsibility for the 2019 bombing of a Bogotá police academy that killed 22 people and injured 87 others. 

The Cuban government did not formally respond to the extradition requests for ELN leaders Victor Orlando Cubides (aka “Pablo Tejada”) and Ramírez Pineda (aka “Pablo Beltrán”) filed by Colombia. 

Cuba also harbors several U.S. fugitives from justice wanted on charges related to political violence, many of whom have resided in Cuba for decades.  For example, the Cuban regime refused to return Joanne Chesimard, aka Assata Shakur, a fugitive on the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists List, who was convicted of murdering New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster. 

Cuba also refused to return William “Guillermo” Morales, a fugitive bomb maker for the Armed Forces for National Liberation, who is wanted by the FBI and escaped detention after his conviction on charges related to domestic terrorism; Ishmael LaBeet, aka Ishmael Muslim Ali, who received eight life sentences after being convicted of killing eight persons in the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1972 and hijacking a plane to flee to Cuba in 1984; Charles Lee Hill, who has been charged with killing New Mexico State Policeman Robert Rosenbloom in 1971;  Ambrose Henry Montfort, who used a bomb threat to hijack a passenger aircraft and fly to Cuba in 1983; and Víctor Manuel Gerena, a Puerto Rican militant who stole $7 million in a bank heist. 

LINK TO COMPLETE REPORT IN PDF FORMAT

Misleading Tweet By Biden-Harris Department Of State Emulates Trump-Pence Department Of State.  So Much For Wanting To Be Different.  Channeling Michael Kozak.

Misleading Tweet By Biden-Harris Department Of State Emulates Trump-Pence Department Of State.  So Much For Wanting To Be Different.  Channeling Michael Kozak.

The commercial export from the United States to the Republic of Cuba of agricultural commodities, food products, and healthcare products (medical equipment, medical instruments, medical supplies, pharmaceuticals) is not an act of benevolence by the Biden-Harris Administration (2021- ).  To suggest so is a lie.  These commercial exports are specifically authorized by statutes (1992 and in 2000), legislation approved by the United States Congress and then signed into law by the president of the United States. The primary goals are to provide new markets to United States exporters.”

Tweet Published By The Embassy of the United States, Havana, Republic of Cuba (22 February 2023): “En 2021, Estados Unidos autorizó más de 4.200 millones de dólares en exportaciones humanitarias a Cuba. En 2022, autorizamos 7.600 millones de dólares de exportaciones humanitarias. Estas exportaciones tienen como objetivo ayudar directamente al pueblo cubano.” 

English Translation (Google): “In 2021, the United States authorized more than $4.2 billion in humanitarian exports to Cuba. In 2022, we authorize $7.6 billion of humanitarian exports. These exports are intended to directly help the Cuban people.” 

Follow-Up Email From The United States Department of State: “The 2022 figure is 7.6 billion dollars, the 2021 figure is 4.2 billion.  These are figures reflect the combined value of all goods authorized for export from the US to Cuba including food, medicine, and everyday goods.  These are not strictly confined to purchases from US companies but include humanitarian donations by individuals and organizations.  The authorized figure does not necessarily reflect actual exports or donations.” 

For perspective:  

Agricultural Commodity/Food Commercial Exports Delivered To Cuba
2022- US$328,536,988.00
2021- US$304,774,413.00

For the period 2001 through 2022, from when the first agricultural commodity and food products were exported from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under provisions of the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act (TSREEA) of 2000, the value delivered was US$6,903,726,366.00.   

Healthcare Products Commercial Exports Delivered To Cuba
2022- US$9,226,763.00
2021- US$487,886.00

For the period 2003 through 2022, the value of healthcare products (medical equipment, medical instruments, medical supplies, pharmaceuticals) delivered from the United States to the Republic of Cuba under provisions of the Cuban Democracy Act (CDA) of 1992 was US$36,419,340.00

Donations Delivered To Cuba
2022- US$30,083,306.00
2021- US$11,074,090.00

For the period 2014 through 2022, the value of humanitarian donations delivered from the United States to the Republic of Cuba was US$68,682,418.00

Why did the United States Department of State not include the details, the context, in its initial tweet?  Because the intention was to deliberately mislead to the benefit of the Biden-Harris Administration (2021- ) and to the detriment of the Diaz-Canel-Valdes Mesa Administration (2019- ).   

  • The message was designed to embarrass, humiliate the government of the Republic of Cuba.  That objective is perfectly acceptable when using facts to support the goal.  That objective is profoundly objectionable when using the imperator, the credibility of the government of the United States government. 

  • The misuse of data in this manner permits the government of the Republic of Cuba to justifiably respond- it is accused by the United States Department of State of lying and misusing statistics and here the United States Department of State engages in equally egregious behavior. 

This official statement from the United States Embassy in Havana, Republic of Cuba, is a repeat of what previous administrations have done- be reckless with the facts, and present information that they know fully is misleading.  It’s disrespectful.  It's disgraceful. 

The Biden-Harris Administration knows that the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) of the United States Department of Commerce has since the Bush-Cheney Administration (2001-2009) and during the Obama-Biden Administration (2009-2017), and Trump-Pence Administration (2017-2021) encouraged companies, organizations, and individuals who are exporting products from the United States to the Republic of Cuba- whether commercial (sold) or donated, not be required to seek a BIS license (if one is required) for the precise U.S. Dollar value of a particular shipment.   

Rather, to reduce paperwork, the exporter is encouraged to bundle expectations.  For example, if a company has an order for US$2 million in poultry, then the exporter might seek a license value of US$75 million or more or less so that if there are subsequent orders within the validity of the BIS license (usually three years to four years) additional BIS licenses are not required.  Same is true for donations- if an organization is hopeful to have US$10 million, then include US$100 million or more or less in the BIS license application.  

One example of how the data in the Tweet published on 22 February 2023 by the United States Department of State is misleading- the US$7.6 billion value is more than the value of all agricultural commodity, food product, healthcare product, and donations since December 2001.  

LINK TO STATISTICS IN PDF FORMAT 

Related Tweets From United States Department Of State 

Two Tweets From US Assistant Secretary Of State Michael Kozak Devoid Of Important Context And Details; He's Done It Before April 11, 2020 

Clarification To Tweet From Michael Kozak, US Assistant Secretary Of State About U.S. Exports To Cuba September 24, 2019 

“On 23 September 2019, The Honorable Michael G. Kozak, Acting Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs “retweeted” a “tweet” from the Embassy of the United States in Cuba.  LINK: https://twitter.com/WHAAsstSecty/status/1176240454104473601  

The publication of a US$12 billion “authorized” value since January 2018 is misleading and unnecessarily reinforces questions of credibility for statements by the United States Department of State.  Context is important.  Thus far in 2019, approximately US$186,114,479.00 (through 30 July 2019) in ag/food products have been exported from the United States to Cuba. Thus far in 2019, Cuba ranks 50th among 229 United States ag/food export markets.  Exports in 2018 were US$224,910,413.00 and exports in 2017 were US$268,800,005.00.  

Since December 2001, more than US$6,061,327,697.00 (through 30 July 2019) in ag/food products have been exported to Cuba.  Link To monthly report: https://www.cubatrade.org/blog/2019/9/6/us-ag-exports-to-cuba-increased-1002-in-july-remain-up-10-year-to-year  

For many years, through the Bush-Cheney Administration, Obama-Biden Administration and thus far through the Trump-Pence Administration, United States exporters have been encouraged by the United States Department of Commerce to submit export license requests with gross estimates, often aspirational, so that they would not need to repeatedly seek licenses.  Most licenses are valid for two years.    

During the Bush-Pence Administration, the process was initiated at the recommendation of United States exporters to lessen often repetitive paperwork and was enthusiastically accepted by the United States Department of Commerce.  

Important to note that the values placed in the license applications often are done without any input from the Cuba-based importer.  As a result, the overall authorized values are often inflated.  This is not the first time an administration has misused the data- and previous administrations have corrected the context by which they have used the data.”

LINK TO COMPLETE ANALYSIS IN PDF FORMAT