Francisco Industries, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. [1:21-cv-21679].

Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA (plaintiff)
Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto, P.L. (defendant)

LINK: Unopposed Motion For An Extension Of Time To File A Response To Plaintiff’s Complaint (5/21/21)

Excerpt:

“Under present deadlines, Defendant’s response to the Complaint is due on May 24, 2021. Undersigned counsel requests a thirty (30) day extension, up to and including June 23, 2021. This extension is necessary as a result of current deadlines in other matters and to give sufficient time for counsel to acquaint themselves with the case and to prepare a response to the Complaint. The amount of time sought is the minimum amount of time needed to prepare a response to the Complaint.”

Previous Posts:

Fanjul Family Responds To Libertad Act Lawsuit-Plaintiff "conduct is malicious and aimed only at tarnishing the reputation of ASR Group and the Fanjul family." (5/11/21)

Cuban vs. Cuban: 9th Largest Certified Claimant Sues Billionaire Fanjul Family-Controlled Company For Trafficking In Sugar From Cuba To UK. This Lawsuit Could Be A Brawl. (5/11/21)